How to Draft a Parenting Plan Without a Lawyer in South Dakota
If you're drafting a parenting plan without a lawyer in South Dakota, the process comes down to three connected tasks: choosing a residential schedule that works for your child's life, allocating legal and physical custody in a way the circuit court will approve, and understanding how your schedule choices shift your child support obligation. South Dakota's Unified Judicial System provides the forms for free — Form UJS-185 for stipulations, Form UJS-302 for the standard parenting guidelines. What the forms don't provide is the decision-making framework that connects schedule design to child support math to court expectations. That's the gap where most self-represented parents get stuck.
This guide walks through the complete process — every provision the court expects, the overnight threshold that changes your support formula, and the common drafting mistakes that lead to rejected plans or expensive post-decree modifications.
Start With the UJS-302 Parenting Guidelines
The South Dakota Parenting Guidelines (Form UJS-302) are the baseline for every parenting plan in the state. When parents cannot agree on a different plan, these guidelines become the mandatory initial plan and enforceable court order upon commencement of the action under SDCL 25-4A-11. They include age-specific schedule recommendations, exchange protocols, and communication standards.
Your parenting plan can follow the standard guidelines exactly, modify them by mutual agreement, or propose an entirely different structure — but the court will compare whatever you submit against the UJS-302 framework. Knowing what the guidelines contain and where your plan departs from them is the first step in drafting a plan a judge will approve.
Key provisions in UJS-302 that your plan must address:
- Residential schedule — the regular two-week rotation, including midweek contacts
- Holiday and vacation schedule — alternating holidays, summer parenting time, school breaks
- Exchange logistics — times, locations, transportation responsibilities
- Communication protocols — how parents communicate about the child, how the child communicates with the non-residential parent
- Decision-making allocation — which parent makes decisions in each category (education, healthcare, religious upbringing, extracurricular activities)
- Right of first refusal — when the residential parent can't be with the child, whether the other parent gets first option before a third-party caregiver
- Dispute resolution — the process for resolving disagreements (mediation before court)
The Provisions Your Plan Must Include
A complete South Dakota parenting plan covers every aspect of the child's daily life that could become a point of conflict. Circuit judges review plans for completeness — a plan that covers the regular schedule but ignores holidays, transportation, or decision-making may be sent back for revision.
Custody Structure
South Dakota recognizes two independent dimensions of custody:
- Legal custody — the right to make major decisions about the child's education, healthcare, religious upbringing, and extracurricular activities. Can be joint (shared decision-making) or sole (one parent decides).
- Physical custody — where the child lives. Can be primary (child lives mostly with one parent) or shared (roughly equal time with both parents).
These combine independently. Joint legal custody with primary physical custody to one parent is the most common arrangement — both parents decide together on major issues, but the child has one primary home. Your plan needs to specify both dimensions clearly.
Residential Schedule Design
This is where the biggest mistakes happen, because the schedule you choose directly determines your child support calculation.
South Dakota uses the 180-night threshold to determine which child support formula applies:
- Under 180 overnights per year with the non-custodial parent: Standard child support formula — the non-custodial parent pays a percentage of income based on the income shares model, with a possible monthly abatement when a valid court order gives that parent six or more overnights per month (or at least 72 overnights per calendar year)
- At least 180 overnights per year for each parent under a qualifying court-ordered shared-parenting plan, with written agreement to share parenting duties, responsibilities, and expenses in proportion to their incomes: Shared parenting cross-credit formula — the combined basic support obligation is multiplied by 1.5, then each parent's share is apportioned and offset proportionally by overnights; the court may grant the credit if appropriate
The difference between 179 and 180 overnights can shift child support by hundreds or thousands of dollars annually. This is not an abstract calculation — it's the single most consequential number in your parenting plan, and most parents don't discover it until after they've already agreed to a schedule.
When designing your schedule, count the overnights precisely. A standard every-other-weekend schedule from Friday to Monday produces about 78 overnights per year; adding one weekly midweek overnight brings it to about 130 — still below the 180 threshold. A week-on/week-off schedule produces approximately 182 overnights — just above it. The schedule you draft is simultaneously a parenting decision and a financial decision.
Holiday and Vacation Provisions
The UJS-302 guidelines provide a standard alternating holiday schedule. Your plan can follow this exactly or modify it. Common approaches:
- Alternating by odd/even years — Parent A gets Thanksgiving in odd years, Parent B in even years
- Split holidays — morning with one parent, afternoon/evening with the other (common for Christmas)
- Fixed holidays — certain holidays always with the same parent (Mother's Day always with mom, Father's Day always with dad)
- Summer blocks for children age 5+ whose parents live less than 200 miles apart — up to 14 days of vacation time in total for each parent, with no more than 7 days at one time and, when possible, 30 days' advance notice
The key drafting rule: be specific. "Parents will share holidays" is the kind of vague language that generates post-decree conflicts. "Parent A has Thanksgiving from Wednesday 6:00 PM through Sunday 6:00 PM in odd-numbered years" can be enforced once it is included in a court order.
Decision-Making Allocation
For joint legal custody, specify how decisions are made in each category:
- Education — school enrollment, special education services, tutoring
- Healthcare — medical treatment, therapy, medications (emergency care is typically excluded — either parent can authorize emergency treatment)
- Religious upbringing — church attendance, religious education, ceremonies
- Extracurricular activities — sports, music lessons, camps
The plan should include a tie-breaking mechanism for disagreements — typically mediation, then a return to court. Without a specified process, every disagreement becomes a potential contempt motion.
Communication and Information Sharing
Include provisions for:
- How parents will communicate about the child (email, co-parenting app, text)
- How the child will communicate with the non-residential parent (phone calls, video calls, frequency)
- Access to school records, medical records, and activity schedules
- Notification requirements for school events, medical appointments, and emergencies
Common Drafting Mistakes That Get Plans Rejected
Vague language. "Reasonable parenting time" means something different to each parent and to each judge. Specify days, times, and locations. A plan that requires interpretation is a plan that generates conflict.
Ignoring the overnight count. Parents agree to a schedule that "feels fair" without calculating the actual overnights. Three months later, one parent discovers the 180-night threshold and wants to renegotiate. Build the overnight count into your drafting process from the start.
Missing provisions. The court expects a complete plan. Leaving out transportation responsibilities, right of first refusal, or dispute resolution doesn't mean those issues disappear — it means they'll surface as post-decree conflicts that require expensive modification proceedings.
Conflicting terms. The regular schedule says exchanges at 6:00 PM Friday, but the holiday schedule says Thanksgiving break starts Wednesday after school. Which controls? Review your plan for conflicts between the regular schedule, holiday schedule, and summer schedule.
No mechanism for changes. Children's needs change as they grow. A plan written for a toddler won't work for a teenager. Include a provision for periodic review and a process for requesting modifications (typically requiring a "substantial change in circumstances" under South Dakota law).
Free Download
Get the South Dakota — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist
Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.
Who This Process Is For
- Parents in uncontested or low-conflict situations who can negotiate a parenting plan together
- Self-represented litigants who need to draft a plan for submission to the circuit court
- Parents preparing for mandatory mediation under SDCL 25-4-56 who want to arrive with a structured proposal
- Anyone who wants to understand the child support implications of their schedule choices before agreeing to anything
Who Should Hire a Lawyer Instead
- Parents in high-conflict cases where domestic violence, substance abuse, or child safety is a concern
- Cases involving interstate relocation or UCCJEA jurisdictional disputes
- Situations where one parent has already hired an attorney — the power imbalance in a contested hearing between a represented and unrepresented parent is significant
- Complex financial situations where child support calculations involve business income, multiple jobs, or disputed earnings
Using a Guide to Draft Your Plan
The South Dakota Child Custody & Parenting Plan Guide provides the complete drafting framework for every provision listed above — residential schedules with overnight counting worksheets, the child support math for both the standard and shared parenting formulas, holiday rotation templates, and a decision-making allocation checklist. It's designed for parents who want to draft their own plan with the same structural completeness a family lawyer would provide, at a fraction of the cost.
The guide also includes a consultation-threshold chapter that helps you identify when the complexity of your case exceeds what self-representation can handle — so you're not guessing about whether you need professional counsel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does South Dakota require a parenting plan in every custody case?
Yes. Every custody case — whether part of a divorce or a standalone paternity/custody action — requires a parenting plan that addresses residential schedules, decision-making authority, and communication protocols. The court will not finalize custody without one. If the parents can't agree, the UJS-302 guidelines become the initial parenting plan and enforceable court order; if a parent objects, the court schedules a hearing.
Can I modify a parenting plan after it's finalized?
Yes, but you'll need to show a "substantial change in circumstances" to modify a court-approved plan. This is a deliberate legal standard designed to provide stability — it means you can't simply change your mind about the schedule. Common qualifying changes include a parent's relocation, a significant change in the child's needs (medical, educational), or a material change in either parent's work schedule. Draft your initial plan carefully, because modifying it later requires going back to court.
Do both parents have to agree on the parenting plan?
Not necessarily. If both parents agree, they submit a stipulated plan to the court, which the judge approves if it meets the child's best interests. If they can't agree, the court orders mediation under SDCL 25-4-56 unless a statutory exception applies, including qualifying domestic abuse. If mediation fails, the case may proceed to a hearing where the judge decides based on the Fuerstenberg best-interests factors. Having a well-drafted proposal — even if the other parent disagrees — demonstrates preparation and gives the court a concrete plan to evaluate.
How many overnights is a typical custody schedule in South Dakota?
It depends on the arrangement. Every-other-weekend from Friday to Monday produces roughly 78 overnights per year. Adding one weekly midweek overnight brings that to about 130; adding two weekly midweek overnights brings it to about 182. A 5-2-2-5 rotation produces approximately 182. A week-on/week-off schedule produces 182–183. The 180-night threshold is the critical number — above it, a qualifying shared-parenting plan may allow the court to grant the shared parenting cross-credit formula, which can reduce the support obligation for the higher-earning parent.
What if the other parent won't cooperate on drafting the plan?
Start by drafting your own complete proposal. When the court orders mandatory mediation, you'll present this proposal to the mediator along with your reasoning. Having a structured, detailed plan demonstrates preparation and gives the mediator a foundation to work from. If mediation fails, the same proposal becomes your evidence at the hearing — the judge will compare your complete plan against whatever the other parent has (or hasn't) prepared.
Get Your Free South Dakota — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist
Download the South Dakota — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.