$0 Hawaii — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Domestic Violence and Child Custody in Hawaii

Domestic Violence and Child Custody in Hawaii

When a Hawaii Family Court finds that a parent has committed family violence, the custody analysis fundamentally changes. The court shifts from a balanced evaluation of sixteen best-interest factors to a protective framework where the safety of the child and the victim parent becomes the paramount priority.

The Rebuttable Presumption

Under HRS § 571-46(a)(9), a finding of family violence creates a rebuttable presumption that it is detrimental to the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody with the perpetrator.

This means the burden of proof shifts. Instead of both parents arguing their case on equal footing, the perpetrator must prove — by a preponderance of evidence — that awarding them any form of custody is safe and in the child's best interest.

To rebut the presumption, the perpetrator typically needs to demonstrate:

  • Successful completion of a licensed batterer's intervention program
  • Completion of substance abuse counseling (if applicable)
  • Completion of additional parenting education
  • Evidence that the child and victim parent can be adequately protected

How Domestic Violence Changes the Process

Several procedural safeguards activate when family violence is established:

Mediation is waived: Mandatory mediation — which is otherwise required in all contested custody cases — is deemed inappropriate and waived when family violence has been found or an active protection order is in place under HRS § 571-46.5(d). Forcing a victim to negotiate face-to-face with their abuser undermines safety and fairness.

Cooperation factors are suspended: Two of the sixteen best-interest factors — Factor 5 (willingness to cooperate in developing a plan) and Factor 11 (maintaining family connections) — are suspended when family violence is present. A victim parent who refuses to cooperate with an abusive co-parent or who limits the child's contact with the abusive parent's extended family is not penalized.

Relocation protections: Under HRS § 571-46(a)(15), a parent who relocates or has been absent from the family home to escape family violence cannot be held against them in custody determinations. This is critical — in standard cases, leaving the home can weaken a parent's position. In domestic violence cases, it's explicitly protected.

Supervised Visitation

When the presumption against custody stands but the court determines the perpetrator should maintain some contact with the child, supervised visitation is typically ordered. This can include:

  • Exchanges at a designated Family Visitation Center
  • All visits supervised by a court-approved third party
  • The perpetrator may be ordered to pay supervision fees
  • Requirements to abstain from alcohol for 24 hours before any visit
  • Prohibition on overnight visits until the court determines it's safe

The conditions remain in place until the perpetrator demonstrates sufficient rehabilitation and the court modifies the order.

Free Download

Get the Hawaii — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.

Obtaining a Protective Order

If you need immediate protection, you can file for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) under HRS Chapter 586. TROs can be filed on an ex parte basis at the Family Court — on Oahu, both the Kapolei Courthouse and Kaahumanu Hale accept TRO filings. The TRO is typically granted the same day if the court finds credible evidence of domestic abuse.

A TRO can require the respondent to:

  • Leave the shared residence
  • Stay a specified distance from you and the children
  • Surrender firearms
  • Refrain from contacting you directly or through third parties

The TRO is temporary — a hearing is scheduled within 15 days for a longer-term protection order.

Factor 16: Misuse of Protective Orders

Hawaii also addresses the flip side. Factor 16 of the best-interest factors evaluates whether a parent has filed a false or tactical TRO specifically to gain advantage in a custody case. Filing a bogus protective order to manufacture a domestic violence finding is itself a factor the court weighs against that parent.

Documenting Domestic Violence

If you're in this situation, documentation is essential:

  • Police reports: Even if charges aren't filed, a police report creates an official record
  • Photos of injuries with timestamps
  • Medical records from emergency room visits or doctor appointments
  • Threatening text messages or emails — preserve originals, screenshot with timestamps
  • Witness statements from family members, neighbors, or friends who observed abuse
  • Co-parenting app logs showing controlling or threatening communication

The Hawaii Child Custody & Parenting Plan Guide includes documentation worksheets that help you organize evidence aligned with the sixteen best-interest factors, along with safety planning templates for navigating the custody process when domestic violence is involved.

Get Your Free Hawaii — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Download the Hawaii — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.

Learn More →