Best Interests of the Child in Alaska — The Nine Factors Judges Weigh
The Nine Factors Under AS 25.24.150(c)
When Alaska parents can't agree on custody, the judge must evaluate nine statutory factors and make written findings on each. No single factor automatically controls the outcome — the court weighs all of them together to determine what arrangement serves the child best.
1. The child's needs. Physical, emotional, mental, religious, and social needs. This assessment is age-dependent — an infant needs consistent routines and close bonding, while a teenager's needs center on school stability, peer relationships, and extracurricular commitments.
2. Each parent's capability. The court examines each parent's history of hands-on caregiving, their physical and mental health, and their willingness to prioritize the child's daily welfare. A parent who has consistently managed school pickups, medical appointments, and bedtime routines carries weight here.
3. The child's preference. Alaska sets no minimum age for considering a child's preference. Instead, judges evaluate maturity case by case. Older teenagers' preferences carry substantial weight; younger children's preferences get scrutinized for signs of parental coaching or alignment pressure.
4. Love and affection. The emotional bond between the child and each parent — demonstrated through consistent involvement, not just expressed feelings.
5. Stability and continuity. How long the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment, and whether maintaining that arrangement is in the child's interest. This factor favors keeping children in their established home, school district, and community when that environment is safe.
6. The "friendly parent" provision. Each parent's willingness to encourage a close, continuing relationship between the child and the other parent. Parents who block scheduled visits, undermine the other's authority, or engage in alienating behavior are viewed unfavorably. However, this factor is legally disqualified when one parent demonstrates the other has committed domestic violence or sexual abuse.
7. Domestic violence. Any evidence of domestic violence, child abuse, or neglect in either household. This factor connects to a separate presumption (see below).
8. Substance abuse. Any active substance abuse that directly impacts the child's well-being.
9. Catch-all. Anything else the court deems relevant to the child's welfare.
The Domestic Violence Presumption — AS 25.24.150(g)
When a parent has a history of domestic violence, Alaska law goes beyond the nine-factor analysis. Under AS 25.24.150(g), there is a rebuttable presumption that a parent who has perpetrated domestic violence should not receive any form of custody — sole, joint, legal, or physical.
A "history" under AS 25.24.150(h) means either one incident causing serious physical injury or more than one incident of domestic violence against a partner, child, or household member.
To overcome this presumption, the perpetrating parent must prove all of the following by a preponderance of the evidence:
- Completion of an approved batterers' intervention program
- No ongoing substance abuse (with treatment completion if substance use contributed to the violence)
- No current danger to the child's physical or mental health
- That the child's best interests require this parent's active involvement
When both parents have domestic violence histories, AS 25.24.150(i) directs the court to award sole custody to the parent less likely to continue violent behavior, or to place the child with a suitable third-party guardian.
Importantly, AS 25.24.150(k) prevents the court from using the psychological effects of abuse suffered by a victim parent as grounds to deny them custody — unless those effects render the parent unable to safely care for the child.
The Best Interests Affidavit
Parents present their case through the Best Interests Affidavit (Form DR-965), a notarized document where you walk through each of the nine factors with specific evidence from your family's situation. This is your primary vehicle to show the judge how your proposed custody arrangement serves the child.
The Alaska Custody & Parenting Plan Guide includes a structured best-interests evidence organizer that maps your daily parenting involvement to each statutory factor, helping you build a focused DR-965 rather than writing a scattered narrative.
Get Your Free Alaska — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist
Download the Alaska — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.