$0 England — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Domestic Abuse and Child Custody in the UK — C1A, Non-Molestation Orders, and Coercive Control

When domestic abuse is part of a separation, the child arrangements process in England changes fundamentally. The standard expectation — that both parents will participate in mediation, negotiate constructively, and share parenting time — gives way to a safety-first framework where the court's primary concern is protecting the children from harm.

Following the 2026 repeal of the statutory presumption of parental involvement, judges no longer start from the assumption that contact with both parents is automatically beneficial. Instead, every case involving abuse allegations is assessed on its facts, and each parent must demonstrate how their proposed involvement supports the child's safety and welfare.

Here's how the system works when domestic abuse is in the picture.

Form C1A: Raising Allegations at the Start

When you file a C100 application for a Child Arrangements Order and there are safeguarding concerns, you file Form C1A alongside it. This is the official mechanism for bringing allegations of domestic abuse to the court's attention.

Form C1A asks you to detail:

  • The type of abuse: physical violence, emotional abuse, psychological abuse, sexual abuse, financial abuse, coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Whether the abuse was directed at you, the children, or both
  • Specific incidents with dates, descriptions, and any evidence
  • Whether there are existing protective orders (non-molestation orders, restraining orders)
  • Whether police, social services, or medical professionals have been involved

The form goes directly to Cafcass, who use it to shape their safeguarding investigation and, where applicable, the Child Impact Report. It also goes to the judge, who reads it before the first hearing. Filing C1A isn't optional if there are genuine safety concerns — failing to raise them at the outset can make it harder to introduce them later in proceedings.

Non-Molestation Orders and Their Effect on Contact

A non-molestation order (NMO) is a protective injunction under Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996. It prohibits the respondent from using or threatening violence, intimidating, harassing, or pestering the applicant or the children. Breaching an NMO is a criminal offence carrying up to five years' imprisonment.

What an NMO doesn't automatically do is stop contact. An NMO and a Child Arrangements Order are separate legal instruments. A parent can be prohibited from contacting or approaching the other parent directly while still having court-ordered contact with the children — typically through a structured arrangement:

  • Handovers through a third party: A family member, friend, or contact centre facilitates transitions so the parents don't meet
  • Contact centre supervision: Sessions take place at a professionally supervised contact centre
  • Indirect contact: The parent has contact through letters, cards, or video calls rather than face-to-face meetings

The court weighs whether contact can be made safe for the children given the NMO. If the risk assessment shows that contact — even supervised — would expose the children to emotional harm or risk, the court can order no contact at all.

How Coercive Control Affects Child Arrangements

The Serious Crime Act 2015 made coercive or controlling behaviour a criminal offence in England and Wales. In family proceedings, coercive control is treated as a form of domestic abuse under Practice Direction 12J, which governs how courts handle cases involving allegations of harm.

Coercive control doesn't require physical violence. It includes patterns of behaviour such as:

  • Financial control — restricting access to money, monitoring spending, controlling bank accounts
  • Isolation — cutting off contact with family, friends, or support networks
  • Monitoring and surveillance — tracking movements, checking phones, controlling social media
  • Degradation — persistent criticism, humiliation, undermining of parenting capability
  • Threats — implicit or explicit threats of harm, custody threats ("I'll make sure you never see them"), or threats of suicide

Courts recognise that coercive control can continue after separation through the child arrangements process itself — using contact handovers to intimidate, manipulating children as messengers, or using court proceedings as a tool of control (sometimes called "litigation abuse").

When coercive control is established, the court may:

  • Restrict direct contact to supervised sessions
  • Impose a communication protocol (written only, through a co-parenting app, or through solicitors)
  • Prohibit the controlling parent from making applications to court without permission (a Section 91(14) barring order), preventing repeated proceedings as a form of harassment

Free Download

Get the England — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.

Fact-Finding Hearings

If the allegations in Form C1A are serious and disputed, the court will schedule a Fact-Finding Hearing before making any final decisions about contact or living arrangements. During this hearing:

  1. The alleging parent presents their evidence — documents, witness statements, police records, medical reports
  2. The responding parent presents their account
  3. Both parties may be cross-examined (with special measures in place for vulnerable witnesses — screens, separate waiting areas, or video links)
  4. The judge determines, on the balance of probabilities, whether the alleged incidents occurred

The findings are binding for the rest of the proceedings. If the judge finds that domestic abuse occurred, all subsequent decisions about contact are made through the lens of that finding. The court must then assess:

  • Whether the child is at risk of physical or emotional harm during contact
  • What safeguards would be necessary to make contact safe
  • Whether the abusive parent has taken any steps to address their behaviour (completed a perpetrator programme, for example)
  • Whether contact serves the child's welfare, taking the findings into account

MIAM Exemptions for Domestic Abuse

If domestic abuse is relevant and you have supporting evidence, you can claim the domestic-abuse exemption from the mandatory MIAM requirement. You don't need to attend a mediation assessment before filing your C100 if the exemption applies. Supporting evidence can include:

  • A police report or caution
  • A relevant conviction
  • A protective injunction (NMO, restraining order, occupation order)
  • A referral to a Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC)
  • A letter from a domestic abuse refuge or support organisation
  • A letter from a GP or health professional confirming injuries consistent with domestic abuse

You tick the exemption box on the C100 form and attach the supporting evidence. The court can ask for further verification, so do not assume the exemption is accepted without the required evidence.

Protecting Children Through the Process

If you're navigating child arrangements alongside domestic abuse, practical steps that strengthen your position:

  • Keep a contemporaneous record: A dated log of incidents, with specific details, is more persuasive than retrospective accounts. Note dates, times, what happened, who was present, and any immediate impact on the children
  • Preserve evidence: Screenshots of threatening messages, recordings where legally obtained, emails showing controlling behaviour. Don't delete anything
  • Report to professionals: Incidents reported to your GP, the police, or social services create an independent record that corroborates your account
  • Engage with support services: Contact from domestic abuse organisations (such as the National Domestic Abuse Helpline on 0808 2000 247, or Refuge) creates a documented history and connects you with specialist legal advice
  • Don't be pressured into informal agreements: If there's a history of abuse, informal arrangements without court oversight leave you vulnerable. A court order provides enforceability and the framework for safe contact

For a structured approach to documenting your situation and preparing your case — including evidence checklists, welfare-checklist worksheets, and guidance on working with Cafcass — the England Child Custody & Parenting Plan Guide covers the process for parents navigating safety-critical situations.

Get Your Free England — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist

Download the England — Parenting Plan Starter Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.

Learn More →