Decision-Making Responsibility vs Parenting Time Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan parents going through separation encounter two legal concepts that sound similar but operate independently: decision-making responsibility and parenting time. Understanding the boundary between them changes how you approach your entire parenting arrangement — because having one does not automatically give you the other.

What Decision-Making Responsibility Covers

Decision-making responsibility is the authority to make major, long-term choices about your child's life. Under The Children's Law Act, 2020 and the amended Divorce Act, it covers five specific categories:

• Education — school selection, special education decisions, tutoring
• Non-emergency health care — elective procedures, orthodontics, therapy referrals, vaccinations
• Religious and spiritual upbringing — church attendance, religious education, ceremonies
• Cultural and linguistic heritage — particularly significant for Indigenous children, where continuity with community, language, and territory receives explicit statutory protection
• Significant extracurricular activities — competitive sports, intensive arts programs, anything with a substantial time or financial commitment

Routine, day-to-day decisions — what the child eats, bedtime, play dates, homework — fall outside this category entirely. Those belong to whichever parent has the child during their parenting time.

What Parenting Time Covers

Parenting time is the physical schedule: which parent has the child, on which days, at which hours. It replaces the old concepts of "physical custody" (for the primary parent) and "access" (for the other parent).

During your designated parenting time, you have sole authority over day-to-day decisions. You do not need to consult the other parent about whether the child can sleep over at a friend's house or have pizza for dinner. This is true regardless of whether decision-making responsibility is held jointly or solely.

How They Interact

The critical point: these two concepts are decided independently. A court can order any combination:

Joint decision-making + equal parenting time. Both parents share major decisions and split the child's physical schedule roughly 50/50. This requires a cooperative relationship — or at least the ability to communicate about the five major-decision categories without conflict.

Joint decision-making + unequal parenting time. Both parents retain a say on education and medical choices, but the child lives primarily with one parent (say, an 80/20 or 70/30 split). The parent with less time still participates fully in major decisions.

Sole decision-making + shared parenting time. One parent makes all major decisions, but the child spends significant time with both. This arrangement arises when one parent has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to cooperate on major decisions — often in cases involving family violence or patterns of coercive control.

Sole decision-making + limited parenting time. One parent holds both decision-making authority and the majority of physical time. The other parent has defined parenting time (often structured, sometimes supervised) but no authority over major choices.

When Courts Limit Joint Decision-Making

Saskatchewan courts start from the principle that children benefit from both parents' involvement. But joint decision-making requires a baseline capacity to communicate, and judges may limit or decline it where:

• There is a documented history of family violence or coercive control. In R.R. v. MK, 2022 SKQB 33, the Court of King's Bench ruled that financial control and psychological abuse made joint decision-making inappropriate because the abusive parent would use the consultation requirement to continue controlling the victim.
• One parent has a pattern of unilaterally making major decisions and presenting them as fait accompli.
• The parents' conflict level is so severe that every decision becomes a battle, which harms the child through chronic exposure to parental hostility.

In these situations, the court may allocate sole decision-making responsibility to one parent — not as a punishment, but because joint decision-making cannot function without a minimum level of cooperation.

The Unmarried Parent Default

Here is a detail that catches many Saskatchewan parents off guard. Under Section 3(2) of The Children's Law Act, 2020, if unmarried parents never lived together after the child's birth, the parent with whom the child resides holds sole decision-making responsibility by default. No court order created this arrangement — it is the statutory starting point.

The other parent retains the right to apply for a parenting order, but until they do, they have no legal authority to participate in major decisions. For unmarried fathers in particular, this default often comes as a surprise and is a strong reason to seek a formal parenting agreement early.

What This Means for Your Parenting Plan

When you draft your parenting plan, address both concepts explicitly and separately. State which parent (or both) holds decision-making responsibility — and consider whether you want to split it by category (one parent decides education; the other decides health care). Then lay out the parenting time schedule with enough specificity that a stranger could read it and know exactly where the child should be on any given day.

The Saskatchewan Child Custody & Parenting Plan Guide walks through both components with drafting templates and real-world examples, so you can build an arrangement that reflects your family's situation rather than defaulting to a one-size-fits-all framework.

See more Saskatchewan guides →