ACT Property Settlement Process: How Divorce Assets Are Divided

The Australian Capital Territory does not split assets 50/50 by default. There is no fixed formula and no automatic entitlement based on the length of the marriage. Instead, every property settlement in the ACT must satisfy the "just and equitable" requirement under Section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975.

Since 10 June 2025, the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 has codified the long-standing four-step process directly into Section 79(3). What courts had been doing as common law practice is now statute.

Step 1: Identify and Value Everything

The first step is building the complete asset pool. This includes all assets and liabilities owned by either party at the date of settlement — not the date of separation.

Everything goes in:

• The family home and any investment properties
• Bank accounts, shares, and managed funds
• Superannuation (including PSS and CSS for ACT public servants)
• Business interests, trusts, and company holdings
• Vehicles, personal property, and collectibles above $10,000
• Cryptocurrency and digital assets
• All debts — mortgages, credit cards, personal loans, HECS-HELP, and tax liabilities

Assets brought into the relationship by one party are not automatically excluded. They form part of the total pool but are recognised as an initial contribution in the next step.

Step 2: Assess Contributions

The court assesses what each party contributed to the relationship across three categories:

Financial contributions — income earned, assets brought in, inheritances received, and direct financial investments in property or business.

Non-financial contributions — renovations, business management, property maintenance, and other hands-on work that increased the value of an asset.

Homemaker and parenting contributions — the Family Law Act treats these as equal in value to direct financial contributions. A parent who stayed home to raise children while the other built a career is recognised as having contributed to the growth of the entire asset pool.

The 2024 amendments added a new factor: the impact of family violence on contributions. If one party subjected the other to violence, the court can adjust the contribution assessment to recognise that the victim-survivor's contributions were made under significantly more difficult circumstances.

For short relationships (under five years), initial contributions carry more weight — courts tend to return parties closer to their pre-relationship positions. For long relationships (over ten years), non-financial and homemaker contributions typically erode any initial financial disparity.

Step 3: Evaluate Future Needs

After assessing contributions, the court considers each party's future circumstances under Section 75(2). Factors include:

• Earning capacity — current income, qualifications, and realistic employment prospects
• Age and health — a 55-year-old with limited employment options has different future needs than a 35-year-old professional
• Care of children — the parent with primary care typically needs stable housing and reduced work capacity
• Economic abuse — the 2024 amendments explicitly allow adjustment if one party systematically restricted the other's financial autonomy
• Material wastage — if one party recklessly depleted assets (gambling, unilateral spending sprees), the court can adjust the split to account for the dissipation

Step 4: Is It Just and Equitable?

The court steps back and asks whether the overall outcome is fair. This is not a rubber stamp — if the mathematical result of steps 2 and 3 produces an outcome that would leave one party destitute while the other walks away comfortable, the court adjusts.

In practice, ACT property settlements typically fall between 55/45 and 65/35. An equal 50/50 split is common only when contributions and future needs are genuinely balanced.

ACT-Specific Administrative Steps

The legal framework is federal, but executing the settlement requires navigating ACT territory agencies:

Access Canberra Land Titles Office — property transfers under consent orders or BFAs are lodged at the Dickson Specialised Centre or through PEXA (electronic conveyancing). The transfer requires the sealed court orders and identity verification under the Land Titles (Verification of Identity) Rules 2020.

ACT Revenue Office stamp duty exemption — property transfers under court orders (Concession Code 232F) or BFAs (232G for married, 232H for de facto) are exempt from conveyance duty. You claim the exemption by submitting a Buyer Verification Declaration online before lodging the transfer.

12-month deadline — married couples have exactly 12 months from the date the divorce order becomes final to file property settlement proceedings. De facto couples have two years from separation. Miss these deadlines and you need special leave from the court.

The Practical Sequence

1. Separate and document the date
2. Gather financial records and request superannuation valuations (4-12 weeks)
3. Attempt family dispute resolution through the ACT Conflict Resolution Service or a private mediator
4. Draft and file consent orders (Form 11, $215) or negotiate a binding financial agreement
5. Execute transfers — refinance, lodge title changes, claim stamp duty exemptions

The ACT Divorce Financial Split Guide walks through each step with worksheets for the asset pool, a contributions assessment framework, and the exact forms and codes needed for ACT title transfers.

See more Australian Capital Territory guides →